{
  "rubricVersion": 1,
  "labelComparisons": 30,
  "initialExactAgreements": 28,
  "disagreements": [
    {
      "attemptId": "recovery__screening__a-b__to-b__shared__4__attempt-1",
      "dimension": "d5_comparison",
      "parentInitial": "correct",
      "reviewer": "mixed_or_unclear"
    },
    {
      "attemptId": "social__request__included__2",
      "dimension": "d2_information",
      "parentInitial": "correct",
      "reviewer": "incorrect"
    }
  ],
  "adjudication": "Accept reviewer mixed d5 for repeated unresolved actual-payoff outcome-independence claim in fenced reply; accept incorrect d2 for direct substitution of type probability for bluff outcome in social request included2. Remove false corrected-recipient flag: Other recipient is B is correct in A+C/recipientC.",
  "anchors": [
    "Other recipient is B is correct when objective isA+C and observation goesC; other refers to account outside objective, not informed recipient. Do not count an initial recipient mislabel.",
    "Directly substituting P(high|signal) for P(recipient bluff|signal) is a type/outcome information-use error underd2, as well as propagated incorrect probability/policy ind3. Qualitative correct setup does not cancel a persistent incompatible use.",
    "Numerically correct expected cost can coexist with unresolved assertions that actual settled payoff is independent of the observed outcome; if repeated without resolving the distinction, d5mixed_or_unclear, not a residual numeric-error count.",
    "Exclude purely hypothetical and explicitly corrected errors from residual labels. If actual and hypothetical attribution is unclear, mixed_or_unclear."
  ],
  "rubricRevisions": [],
  "interpretation": "Calibration application clarifications, no scoring rule changes. Small targeted sample; agreement is annotation validation, not independent behavioral evidence."
}
